The difference is that resilvering only examines data that. Scrubbing and resilvering are very similar operations. The zpool status command reports the progress of the scrub and summarizes the results of the scrub upon completion. It would appear that you are running 0.6.x, which didn't have compressed send/receive. For replicated (mirror, raidz, or draid) devices, ZFS automatically repairs any damage discovered during the scrub. (locally) to the creator of any newly-created descendent file sys. If the filesystem uses a dedup-capable checksum (eg. The clone parent-child dependency relationship can be reversed by usingįor filesystems or volumes which have saved partially-completed The receive can be resumed with a stream generated by zfs send This is the gist of it: torunzfs send -c ztank/dataBACKUPNAME openssl. Using the zfs send -R command is received, any snapshots that do I have bash script that takes ZFS snapshot and via piping uploads it to s3 bucket.
Zpool send resume openzfs full#
Zfs send subcommand, which by default creates a full stream. Incremental source for a zfs send command. Zfs send -t to resume and complete the zfs receive. I can't find zfs send -c in the man pages. If '-e' is used the receiving system needs to be a ZFS dataset using the same type of compression.įor the delegated permission list, run: zfs allow|unallow I didn't find an explicit statement in the man pages. In the first case zfs send would do decompression first and write to stdout after that. In the second case compressing the output with zpaq (or…) would probably a waste of resources. I hope somebody reading this knows if a 'zfs send' of a dataset - that has compression enabled "internally" (rle,lzo,lz4) - will stream uncompressed data to stdout or not. Posted: Tue 9:16 pm Post subject: 'zfs send ' outputs (un)compressed
Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo Gentoo Forums :: View topic - 'zfs send ' outputs (un)compressed data?
0 kommentar(er)
